International Criminal Court

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Autor/Autorin

Keine Autorendaten verfügbar.

Current and previous cases before the International Criminal Court

The website of the ICC provides information on previous and currently pending cases before the World Court in The Hague. It is in the nature of things that the ICC only takes action once the crime has been committed and people have been murdered and displaced, deprived of their health and a self-determined life. Academics and human rights activists are investigating how we can draw conclusions for preventive action from individual cases of human rights violations.

The importance of testimonies from victims and survivors

The testimonies of victims and survivors are the sources that tell us what the precursors of violence, terror and systematic genocide are that people are subjected to almost everywhere in the world. Their stories provide the keys to the humane living conditions that are necessary to prevent systematic persecution and violence in the future.

Like all legal cases of prosecutions before criminal courts for violent crimes, those before the International Criminal Court are highly instructive in terms of the possibilities for preventing violence and upholding human rights. It is of the utmost importance to analyse the testimonies of victims and survivors and not to regard them merely as instruments of proof to expose the criminal actions of the accused.

When the current cases, or “current situations” as it is called on the Court’s website, are listed here before the ICC, this is therefore not done with the aim of re-examining the motives and motivations of the accused or defendants. While the end of impunity may have a deterrent effect on individuals, punishment alone does not prevent systematic crimes. Neither the level of the possible punishment nor the threat of it have a preventive effect. In other words, deterrence through education in the form of documenting crimes is not enough to prevent crimes and serious human rights violations in the future.

The testimonies of survivors of genocide and genocide also make it clear that it is not military intervention, but the improvement of environmental and social living conditions alone that can, if not completely prevent the escalation of violence and systematic state terror, at least reduce the danger of it in the long term.

The current situation before the ICC

Chronologically by date of referral to the Court


Georgia

  1. December 2015
    Proprio motu
    Opening of the investigation 27 January 2016

> On the ICC website


Central African Republic (II) (ICC-01/14)

  1. May 2014
    Referral by the Central African Republic
    Opening of the investigation 24 September 2014

> On the ICC website


Mali (ICC-01/12)

  1. July 2012
    Referral by Mali
    Opening of the investigation 16 January 2013

> On the ICC website


Côte d’Ivoire (ICC-02/11)

  1. October 2011
    Proprio motu
    Opening of the investigation 3 October 2011

> On the ICC website


Libya (ICC-01/11)

  1. February 2011
    Referral by the UN Security Council
    Opening of investigations 3 March 2011

> On the ICC website
Kenya (ICC-01/09)

  1. March 2010
    Proprio motu
    Opening of the investigation 31 March 2010

> On the ICC website
Sudan (Darfur) (ICC-02/05)

  1. March 2005
    Referral by the UN Security Council
    Opening of the investigation 6 June 2005

>On the ICC website
Central African Republic (ICC-01/05)

  1. January 2005
    Referral by the Central African Republic
    Investigation opened 22 May 2007

> On the ICC website
Democratic Republic of the Congo (ICC-01/04)

  1. April 2004
    Referral by the Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Opening of the investigation 23 June 2004

> On the ICC website
Uganda (ICC-02/04)

  1. January 2004
    Referral by Uganda
    Opening of the investigation 29 July 2004

> On the ICC website